| You are here: | About>Education>Archaeology |
![]() | Archaeology |
Kris's Archaeology BlogPeopling the New World--The Current StatusToday, the journal Science published an article by Ted Goebel, Michael Waters, and Dennis H. O'Rourke, arguing that the Clovis first argument is dead in the water. ![]() Excavation of the Schaefer mammoth in Wisconsin, which is thought by archaeologists to date to about 14,500 years ago. Photo Credit: Courtesy D. Joyce and Science I'm not going to argue too strenuously against this--I've thought that was true since the Monte Verde discovery, but the summary in Science is well worth noting, and it will be really interesting to see what the fallout is. Basically, Goebel, Waters and O'Rourke summarize the archaeological and genetic (mtDNA) evidence and conclude that somebody else got here first. Here's the evidence they summarize:
![]() Clovis bifaces in place in the excavation of the Gault Clovis site in Texas, dating to about 13,000 years ago. Photo Credit: Image courtesy of M. Waters and Science Based on these standing assumptions in the record, Goebel and colleagues argue that colonization of the Americas occurred first about 15,000 years ago, immediately after the Pacific coast became deglaciated. The first Americans were diversified hunter-fishers and used boats, dispersing along the coasts for at least 1,000 years. Clovis, the big-game hunters of mammoths and mastodons, and may be descended from these original Americans, or may represent a second disperal from Beringia.
I'll keep my eyes open for comments around the blog-o-sphere, science news and in the academic press. Friday March 14, 2008 | comments (8) Display Latest Headlines | powered by WordPress |
|
All Topics | Email Article | | | ![]() |
| Advertising Info | News & Events | Work at About | SiteMap | Reprints | Help | Our Story | Be a Guide |
| User Agreement | Ethics Policy | Patent Info. | Privacy Policy | ©2008 About, Inc., A part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved. |




