University of Texas at San Antonio
srussell@lonestar.jpl.utsa.ed
Emerson & Cross, The Sociopolitics of the Living and the Dead: The Treatment of Historic and Prehistoric Remains in Contemporary Midwest America, 14 DEATH STUDIES 555 (1990).
Harjo, Native Peoples' Cultural and Human Rights: An Unfinished Agenda, 24 ARIZ. ST. L. J. 321 (1992).
Iverson, Bodies for Science, 14 DEATH STUDIES 577 (1990).
Johnson & Haensly, Fifth Amendment Takings Implications of the 1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 24 ARIZ. ST. L. J. 151 (1992).
Klesert & Powell, A Perspective on Ethics and the Reburial Controversy, 58 AM. ANTIQUITY 348 (1993).
Livesay, The Impact of the Federal Repatriation Act on State-Operated Museums, 24 ARIZ. ST. L. J. 293 (1992).
Mallouf, The "Battle of the Bill" in Texas, CADDOAN ARCHEOLOGY, Winter 1989-1990 at 7.
Mallouf, The Human Remains Issue: Archeology Under the Gun, TEXAS ARCHEOLOGICAL STEWARDSHIP NEWSLETTER, March 1993 at 1.
Marsh, Walking the Spirit Trail: Repatriation and Protection of Native American Remains and Sacred Cultural Items, 24 ARIZ. ST. L. J. 79 (1992).
McManamon & Nordby, Implementing the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 24 ARIZ. ST. L. J. 217 (1992).
Meighan, Some Scholars' Views on Reburial, 57 AM. ANTIQUITY 704 (1992).
Riding In, Six Pawnee Crania: Historical and Contemporary Issues Associated with the Massacre and Decapitation of Pawnee Indians in 1869, 16 AM. INDIAN CULTURE & RESEARCH J. 101 (1992).
Riding In, Without Ethics and Morality: A Historical Overview of Imperial Archaeology and American Indians, 24 ARIZ. ST. L. J. 11 (1992).
Russell, The Legacy of Ethnic Cleansing: Implementation of NAGPRA in Texas. 19 American Indian Culture and Research Journal 193 (1995).
Russell, A Time to Bury the Dead. 8 Peace Review 245 (1996).
Russell, Picking Bones in the Legislature. Texas Observer, Vol. 89, No. 14, Page 15 (1997).
Stumpf, A Federal Land Management Perspective on Repatriation, 24 ARIZ. ST. L. J. 303 (1992).
Sullivan, A Museum Perspective on Repatriation: Issues and Opportunities, 24 ARIZ. ST. L. J. 283 (1992).
Trope & Echo-Hawk, The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: Background and Legislative History, 24 ARIZ. ST. L. J. 35 (1992).
Turner, What is Lost With Skeletal Reburial?, 7 Q. REV. OF ARCHAEOLOGY 1 (1986).
Vizenor, Bone Courts: The Rights and Narrative Representation of Tribal Bones, 10 AM. INDIAN L. Q. 319 (1986).
Yalung & Wala, A Survey of State Repatriation and Burial Protection Statutes, 24 ARIZ. ST. L. J. 419 (1992).
Yellowman, "Naevahoo'ohtseme"--We Are Going Home: The Cheyenne Repatriation of Human Remains--A Woman's Perspective, 9 ST. THOMAS L. REV. 103 (1996).
Zimmerman, Archaeology, Reburial, and the Tactics of a Discipline's Self-Delusion, 16 AM. INDIAN CULTURE & RESEARCH J. 37 (1992).
Zimmerman, Reflections on the Issues: Implications for the Scholarly Disciplines, 14 DEATH STUDIES 629 (1990). CASES
Charrier v. Bell, 496 So.2d 601 (La. Ct. App.), cert. denied, 498 So.2d 753 (La. 1986).
Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Ass'n, 485 U.S. 439 (1988).
Matter of Indian Cemetery, Queens County, N.Y., 169 Misc. 584 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1938).
United States v. Unknown Heirs of All Persons Buried in Post Oak Mission Cemetery, Comanche County, Okla., 152 F.Supp. 452 (W.D. Okla. 1957).
