Theories about the function of Venus figurines vary widely, and include emblems of a goddess religion, educational materials for children, sex toys for men, and physiological depictions of pregnant women. Intriguingly, one view suggests that they are self-portraits of women, arguing that the body parts are exaggerated because they are seen from a distorted perspective.
Recent studies on Venus figurines include Olga Soffer's work on clothing and textiles illustrated on such figurines, and the flint-knapped images at Wilczyce, Poland.
Sources
Dobres, Marcia Ann. 1996. Venus figurines. Pp 740-741 in Oxford Companion to Archaeology, B. Fagan, ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lesure, Richard G. 2002. The Goddess diffracted: Thinking about the figurines of early villages. Current Anthropology 43(4):587-610.
McDermott, LeRoy. 1996. Self-Representation in Upper Paleolithic Female Figurines. Current Anthropology 37: 227-276.
Soffer, O., J.M. Adovasio, and D.C. Hyland. 2000. The "Venus" Figurines: Textiles, basketry, gender, and status in the Upper Paleolithic. Current Anthropology 41(4):511-537.
This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.


